You mean Al Gore was not ALREADY on an advocacy campaign for manmade climate change?! What the heck was his dumb movie? What the heck is that boatload of hot air permeating from his oral orifice on a near weekly basis via the media spotlight? Why is the media helping him create this illusion that this “NEW” campaign is somehow different from the one we’ve been witnessing for years? I guess this "new" campaign is for those of you tired of the old one.
Why won’t Al Gore—a cult-anointed climatologist—debate some of the smartest people in climate science, like Dr. Richard Lindzen, a climate scientist from MIT and fellow AGW skeptic? I know why. Because Gore's no authority whatsoever; he would have his shorts handed to him in a real scientific debate with a real scientist, because this ain’t politics, baby, though lately it’s getting harder to discern the difference between science and politics.
We deniers (those who are RIGHT ABOUT CLIMATE CHANGE) need a fiscal benefactor to help us fight this load of bull. However, everyone with money in the debate is on the profiteering side of global warming, so we’ll likely be in for a long wait. We’re just going to have to wait for Mother Nature to continue to make buffoons of these alarmists in the way that this winter season did. Hopefully, Al Gore will still be alive by the time AGW is accepted as an undeniable hoax by a greater number of people than currently present in the skeptical ranks; then maybe someone will smarten up and sue his butt like John Coleman suggests.
Wouldn't that $300M be better served towards something real, like AIDS or the homeless?
Gore Launches Ambitious Advocacy Campaign on Climate:
Former vice president Al Gore will launch a three-year, $300 million campaign Wednesday aimed at mobilizing Americans to push for aggressive reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, a move that ranks as one of the most ambitious and costly public advocacy campaigns in U.S. history.
2 comments:
The Head of the WMO, Jarraud, is the same guy who benefited from the embezzlement of 3.5 million USD which was used to rig the election for Secretary General of the WMO in 2003, and who then fired the WMO internal auditor as she tried to follow the money trail and found that it was leading back to senior WMO management--the story was reported in the International Herald Tribune:
http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/01/26/news/UN-GEN-UN-Weather-Agency-Corruption.php
The auditor has filed a legal suit in US Federal District Court in NYC-her complaint (including civil racketeering charges) and her final investigative report can be found at www.unreform-now.org (click on Veiga v. WMO, Jarraud et al. on the left).
The question is why are we listening to such a corrupt organisation as the WMO (and its SG who was initially elected in a rigged election in 2003 using funds embezzled from WMO itself)??? What else are WMO and Jarraud lying about?!?!?! Global warming perhaps????
Good points. Practically all of these U.N. connected "leaders" have proven again and again that they're corrupt, and AGW is the perfect scapegoat behind which they can hide their shenanigans.
I talked about Jarraud in a recent post:
http://globalsham.blogspot.com/2008/04/global-temps-to-decrease.html
Post a Comment