Now, the real question is: How long will all the mainstream media outlets--especially the Green Fad network NBC in all its forms--be able to ignore and bury these stories? When will these damaging facts move from the Op-Ed pages and blogs to the front pages where they belong? There's no way to claim 'out of context' in the countless examples of blatant falsification, data destruction, and unethical behavior on the part of these 'consensus' scientists. The NYT (not surprisingly) just accepted one of the researcher's explanations of the use of the word "hidden" as it relates to calculating temperatures.
One wonders whether these 'really smart people' are aware that they've endangered their careers by being a bunch of liars; fortunately, some of them began salvaging their reputations a while ago, because they realized this balloon could only stay aloft for so long.
If you own any shares in alternative energy companies I should start dumping them NOW. The conspiracy behind the Anthropogenic Global Warming myth (aka AGW; aka ManBearPig) has been suddenly, brutally and quite deliciously exposed after a hacker broke into the computers at the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit (aka Hadley CRU) and released 61 megabites of confidential files onto the internet. (Hat tip: Watts Up With That)
When you read some of those files – including 1079 emails and 72 documents – you realise just why the boffins at Hadley CRU might have preferred to keep them confidential. As Andrew Bolt puts it, this scandal could well be “the greatest in modern science”. These alleged emails – supposedly exchanged by some of the most prominent scientists pushing AGW theory – suggest:
Conspiracy, collusion in exaggerating warming data, possibly illegal destruction of embarrassing information, organised resistance to disclosure, manipulation of data, private admissions of flaws in their public claims and much more.
[From Climategate: the final nail in the coffin of ‘Anthropogenic Global Warming’? – Telegraph Blogs]
Repeatedly throughout the e-mails that have been made public, proponents of global-warming theories refer to data that has been hidden or destroyed. Only e-mails from Mr. Jones' institution have been made public, and with his obvious approach to deleting sensitive files, it's difficult to determine exactly how much more information has been lost that could be damaging to the global-warming theocracy and its doomsday forecasts.
[From EDITORIAL: Hiding evidence of global cooling - Washington Times]
